Fred wrote:I didn't expect such a HP gain just from an air filter!
Fred
Blurr wrote:They aren't going to put a negative story on their website are they?
Agreed, most of the info didn't come from their website though.
I highly doubt that any horsepower gain happens at all, infact for every study in the affirmative is met with another in the negative.
Let the results speak for themselves, I will dyno the bike with the OEM filter, then with the DNA filter.
I do agree though, they are much cheaper however $122 is a bit steep. I only paid $60 for my K&n recently and that was from local Kawa dealer not on special
The equivilent BMC filter (no K&N yet) is $179.12 delivered (bit steep imo) So not a lot of options. Different bike, different prices!
Gosling1 wrote:I will be really interested in the dyno charts - before & after.
$179.12 for a BMC ? Was this local or from US ebay ?
ZXR750 wrote:.....It said 98-99 percent filter efficiency. But it did not say at what micron. A worn footy sock would do the same if the microns are high enough. It may save money with being able to be cleaned but if it lets larger particles through the benefits may not be there....
ZXR750 wrote:It said 98-99 percent filter efficiency. But it did not say at what micron. A worn footy sock would do the same if the microns are high enough. It may save money with being able to be cleaned but if it lets larger particles through the benefits may not be there.
ZXR750 wrote:It said 98-99 percent filter efficiency. But it did not say at what micron. A worn footy sock would do the same if the microns are high enough. It may save money with being able to be cleaned but if it lets larger particles through the benefits may not be there.
Return to General Tech & Performance Talk
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests