Page 2 of 2
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 11:29 am
by MadKaw
I won't buy into this as mine (and 2 others with similar mods) put out about 155 on the dyno. We had no PC's though but I struggle to think that would make much difference with slip ons and its proven there is no gains with a K&N...
Anyway, HP is actually torque (ft lbs) x revs divided by 5252. The torque and HP graphs should always cross at 5252 rpm. The first dyno sheet looks OK based on this, but the second dyno sheet looks like the torque is reading a little high.
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 12:10 pm
by MiG
MadKaw wrote:
Anyway, HP is actually torque x revs divided by 5252.
Depends on the units and whether the scales for both are equal. For Nm and kW and equal scales, the crossover point would be at 9549 RPM. I can provide proof.
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 12:47 pm
by MadKaw
Yep, I'd say the fact that the 2nd dyno is in Nm may be why the torque reads higher.. the conversion makes em similar.
Power kW = (Torque (Nm) x RPM)/9549.3
Power HP = (Torque (ft/lbs) x RPM)/5252.1
1ft-lbs = 1.36 Nm
1HP = .75 KW
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 9:33 pm
by YAPPA
MadKaw wrote:Yep, I'd say the fact that the 2nd dyno is in Nm may be why the torque reads higher.. the conversion makes em similar.
Power kW = (Torque (Nm) x RPM)/9549.3
Power HP = (Torque (ft/lbs) x RPM)/5252.1
1ft-lbs = 1.36 Nm
1HP = .75 KW
Who's a smartypants then
If it starts goes well & can fry a rear tyre it's all good fellas......as Neka would say" Just launch tha carn't!!!!!"
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 7:45 am
by Wattie
on topic is too complicated for me...
SO....
Paz, thats a farrrkin good pic in your sig...
and Farrrk i need a 10!
and faaark you guys are GEEKS!
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 7:53 am
by MadKaw
Wattie wrote:on topic is too complicated for me...
SO....
Paz, thats a farrrkin good pic in your sig...
and Farrrk i need a 10!
and faaark you guys are GEEKS!
Yes but its too big.. Forum rules state sig pics must be under 90 pixels high.. I better delete it.
and we're not geeks, just informed....
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 7:53 am
by hoffy
Wattie wrote:on topic is too complicated for me...
SO....
Paz, thats a farrrkin good pic in your sig...
and Farrrk i need a 10!
and faaark you guys are GEEKS!
agreed
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 5:38 pm
by Gosling1
as a 12 owner...............I'll just point and laugh ..............hahahahaahaha