Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2006 11:33 am
depends who riding the bike i reckon...Stereo wrote:Its faster than a fair few bikes...Bartofsky wrote:still not as fast as a bike though. But it is a seriously nice bit of kit... for a car.
Kawasaki Sportsbike Riders Club - Australia - Online Forum
Australian Kawasaki Sportsbike Riders Discussion Forum - All Welcome, free and easy to join, just click "register" below - www.ksrc-au.com
https://ksrc-au.com/phpBB3/
Look what I've been in
Page 2 of 2
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 9:38 am
Lambourghini Diablo
0-60 mph: 3.6 sec
0-100 mph: 8.8 sec
Quarter Mile: 12 sec @ 122 mph
Skidpad: .97g
Top Speed: 205 mph
Braking, 60-0 mph: 109 ft
Slalom Speed: 70 mph
0-60 mph: 3.6 sec
0-100 mph: 8.8 sec
Quarter Mile: 12 sec @ 122 mph
Skidpad: .97g
Top Speed: 205 mph
Braking, 60-0 mph: 109 ft
Slalom Speed: 70 mph
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 1:53 pm
Yeah, but where's the spot to carry the bike, after all when you get tired of driving, you'll have to ride the bike 
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:31 pm
i dunno my 0-60 speed...but i kno my 1/4 time is 11.1 sec...Stereo wrote:Lambourghini Diablo
0-60 mph: 3.6 sec
0-100 mph: 8.8 sec
Quarter Mile: 12 sec @ 122 mph
Skidpad: .97g
Top Speed: 205 mph
Braking, 60-0 mph: 109 ft
Slalom Speed: 70 mph
interesting....
Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:05 am
Most bikes have a 0-60 (Close enough to 0 - 100km/h to not make a difference) of around 3 seconds... give or take.neka79 wrote:i dunno my 0-60 speed...
Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 6:28 am
Not many bikes have a top speed of 205 MILES per hour
Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 6:47 am
Jase, figures from Stereo are in MILES per hour, bit of a diff b/n 60kmh and 60mph I suggest.aardvark wrote:Most bikes have a 0-60 (Close enough to 0 - 100km/h to not make a difference) of around 3 seconds... give or take.
Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 10:15 am
Errr, yeah, right. And?mick_dundee wrote:Jase, figures from Stereo are in MILES per hour, bit of a diff b/n 60kmh and 60mph I suggest.aardvark wrote:Most bikes have a 0-60 (Close enough to 0 - 100km/h to not make a difference) of around 3 seconds... give or take.
Hence the reason I said "0-60 (Close enought to 0-100)"
60mph is 96.56kmh. Most bikes do the 0-100km/h or 0-60mph in around 3 secons. Some slightly less, some slightly more.
Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 11:07 am
definitely not my bikeMost bikes have a 0-60 (Close enough to 0 - 100km/h to not make a difference) of around 3 seconds...
even it was 0-60kph
Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 4:53 pm
*rubs belly*.....* gazes out window at ZX12R*.....*rubs belly*Stereo wrote:Not many bikes have a top speed of 205 MILES per hour
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 7:48 am
if i could do that, i wouldn't have gotten married!!!!neka79 wrote:blow your own trumpet??cambo: version 2 wrote:u have no idea what i would do for a chance to drive one of them...... nice ride
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 10:39 am
yea..but not many bikes cost $500,000 either...Stereo wrote:Not many bikes have a top speed of 205 MILES per hour
and for the top speed difference (my blade does 290)....the $485000 DIFFERENCE IS...WELL U FIGURE IT OUT...
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 10:42 am
Also, don't forget fuel economy. In something like the Lambo, u give it a thrashing and u r lucky to get 4km/l. Even when ya thrash a bike, ya gotta get atleast twice that?neka79 wrote:yea..but not many bikes cost $500,000 either...Stereo wrote:Not many bikes have a top speed of 205 MILES per hour
and for the top speed difference (my blade does 290)....the $485000 DIFFERENCE IS...WELL U FIGURE IT OUT...