Australian Kawasaki Sportsbike Riders Discussion Forum - All Welcome, free and easy to join, just click "register" below - www.ksrc-au.com
https://ksrc-au.com/phpBB3/
huh..??Daisy wrote:You forgot to say, "Goodday".Duane wrote:We Are All Sexist Rude Yanks, And I Really Want A Job Polishing Things. I'm Out Of Here
Tyre is english.Stereo wrote:Its TIRES you stupid aussie! Stop bastardising the english language!!!smek wrote:No it's not the same shit... IT'S TYRES GODAMMIT!!@#!@#!@!@@!Neka79 wrote: weve had this shit fight before, tyres or tires.... tomato or tomato...
u kno same shit...
donutGlen wrote:Is that doughnut or donut. Can we have an official ruling on this I'm pissed with people spelling doenutt the wrong way.
Fuggin' illitchrutts
NortikittyKat wrote:donutGlen wrote:Is that doughnut or donut. Can we have an official ruling on this I'm pissed with people spelling doenutt the wrong way.
Fuggin' illitchrutts
donut (plural donuts)
noun
Definition:
North America food
Another spelling of doughnut
doughnut [ do nut ]
noun (plural doughnuts)
Definition:
1. round cake with hole or filling: a small sugar-coated cake of sweet dough, fried or baked, and either spherical with a filling of cream or jam, or ring-shaped with no filling
2. mechanical engineering ring-shaped object: an object in the shape of an inflated ring, e.g. an accelerating tube in a nuclear reactor or a baby's floor cushion for sitting in
doenutt [ do nut or doughnut ]
Definition:
1. round cake with jam missing: a small sugar-coated cake of sweet dough, fried or baked, with jam missing, either stolen or spat out.
)hey Jaseaardvark wrote:You know Smitty, the more grandkids you get, the harder your posts are to make any sense of!
Thankfully, not here.Colette wrote:Ah. where's Kishy when you need him
Is this foreplay?Cath wrote:If I was going to critique someone's posting choices, I would construct an argument that had some background, a logical progression of points, preferably include a cite or two, maybe add a spot of humour to lighten the mood and make it seem like a genuine concern not just an off-hand bitching session, and a conclusion. I would then go through my own post with a fine tooth comb, checking my own spelling, grammar and punctuation, as it would be more than a little hypocritical to criticise another's post when your own is flawed. Then I would sit on it for a day, so as not to post something negative in a hasty fashion. Then I would re-check the spelling, grammar and punctuation, paying particular attention to spaces after commas, including question marks where appropriate, and general sentence structure. Wouldn't want to be a hypocrite after all, would we?
Then I would delete it, because I'd realise that this isn't a debate board, a board for spelling nerds, a grammar-nazi haven or even a board that cares overly about that sort of shit. It's a board for motorbikes.
So, how's the ungrammatical, childishly structured sentences, randomly punctuated, ineffectual ranting thing working for you, zzzak?
If it is you're a very sick man Pabs, very sick....Pabs wrote:Is this foreplay?Cath wrote:If I was going to critique someone's posting choices, I would construct an argument that had some background, a logical progression of points, preferably include a cite or two, maybe add a spot of humour to lighten the mood and make it seem like a genuine concern not just an off-hand bitching session, and a conclusion. I would then go through my own post with a fine tooth comb, checking my own spelling, grammar and punctuation, as it would be more than a little hypocritical to criticise another's post when your own is flawed. Then I would sit on it for a day, so as not to post something negative in a hasty fashion. Then I would re-check the spelling, grammar and punctuation, paying particular attention to spaces after commas, including question marks where appropriate, and general sentence structure. Wouldn't want to be a hypocrite after all, would we?
Then I would delete it, because I'd realise that this isn't a debate board, a board for spelling nerds, a grammar-nazi haven or even a board that cares overly about that sort of shit. It's a board for motorbikes.
So, how's the ungrammatical, childishly structured sentences, randomly punctuated, ineffectual ranting thing working for you, zzzak?
It's licence. License in the US and NZ, the 53'rd state of the USA.javaman wrote:Is it licence or license ?
its licence in NZ aswell.... and forgive me if I said "WHAT?" NZ is the 53rd state? When we have banned their warships from our harbours? We have opposed them over Arctic land rights? Have condemned their nuclear testing and have denounced their military actions? It is australia who supports them in every endevour..... and I am pretty sure that John Howard is Bushes gay lover....aardvark wrote:It's licence. License in the US and NZ, the 53'rd state of the USA.javaman wrote:Is it licence or license ?