Used values references!
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 7:47 am
				
				A few people of late, have been bandying about used bike values sourced from the red Book (or others). As someone with over 20 years experience in this industry, I thought it might be prudent and possibly helpfull, to share some information on this resource, which may encourage a more liberal use of the product.
The information contained in this book is more often than not, completely irrelevent to actual values of car/bikes in the market at the time. There are a few reasons for this.
1. The market changes on an almost daily basis. as most are aware, market forces can alter values significantly and immediately. Prices are based on demand. High demand forces prices up, low demand causes some price rationalisation. So, as an example, a new model being released, could cause an influx of trade-ins. eg- Kawasaki release a new 2007 ZX10R, which is lighter more powerful, bettter handling and just sex on wheels-so some of the 04/05/06 10R owners start upgradeing! This causes an influx of used 10's on the market, thus reducing the saleability. This can happen within hours and days, not weeks and months!
2. The information they utilise to estimate values is at best flawed. They according to industry sources, utilise advertised prices from classifieds around the country to form part of their estimation. (and as we all know, we ALWAYS get the price we are asking for our goods don't we?
 )
3. The dealer feedback utilised to ascertain the values, is as far as I am aware limited to one or two M/C dealers across the country! So the core sample is too small to gain any accurate picture.
4. the information, by the time it is gathered, collated, printed, and distributed, is 3-4 months old!
5. Market alter from state to state. As an example, check out used bike prices in QLD as compared to Vic during winter. You will find the Vic market stalls more in winter.
There are numerous other factors also, but I hope I have made my point clear. Just to add some weight to my information, I have copied the "red Book" Disclaimer for you to read. How they can get away, with providing a resource, which they even claim is inaccurate, incorrect, irrelevent, unsuitable and unreliable (their words not mine-read below) I will never know!!!!!!!
"The Red Book" DISCLAIMER - LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
To the extent allowed by law, Automotive Data Services Pty Ltd hereby : declares that it does not give any warranty, whether expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, correctness, relevance, suitabliity or reliability of any information contained in this web-site.
Here is an actual real life example of what I am talking about.........
Red book listing;
2001 E2 Kawasaki ZX9R
Trade in price guide* $6,500 - $7,700
National average price - private sale* $9,000 - $10,600
Price when new (RRP) $17,290
Last night I went and had a look at another ZX9R for a friend. It was an 01 with 27K and a full service history. After negotiating with the seller, he paid, $7000 for it, with 6 mnths rego, brand new tyres, and a RWC supplied! Somehow, I think the Red book/Glass Guide etc are way off the money. And if you read the disclaimers, they even make you aware of it!!!!!!
			The information contained in this book is more often than not, completely irrelevent to actual values of car/bikes in the market at the time. There are a few reasons for this.
1. The market changes on an almost daily basis. as most are aware, market forces can alter values significantly and immediately. Prices are based on demand. High demand forces prices up, low demand causes some price rationalisation. So, as an example, a new model being released, could cause an influx of trade-ins. eg- Kawasaki release a new 2007 ZX10R, which is lighter more powerful, bettter handling and just sex on wheels-so some of the 04/05/06 10R owners start upgradeing! This causes an influx of used 10's on the market, thus reducing the saleability. This can happen within hours and days, not weeks and months!
2. The information they utilise to estimate values is at best flawed. They according to industry sources, utilise advertised prices from classifieds around the country to form part of their estimation. (and as we all know, we ALWAYS get the price we are asking for our goods don't we?
3. The dealer feedback utilised to ascertain the values, is as far as I am aware limited to one or two M/C dealers across the country! So the core sample is too small to gain any accurate picture.
4. the information, by the time it is gathered, collated, printed, and distributed, is 3-4 months old!
5. Market alter from state to state. As an example, check out used bike prices in QLD as compared to Vic during winter. You will find the Vic market stalls more in winter.
There are numerous other factors also, but I hope I have made my point clear. Just to add some weight to my information, I have copied the "red Book" Disclaimer for you to read. How they can get away, with providing a resource, which they even claim is inaccurate, incorrect, irrelevent, unsuitable and unreliable (their words not mine-read below) I will never know!!!!!!!
"The Red Book" DISCLAIMER - LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
To the extent allowed by law, Automotive Data Services Pty Ltd hereby : declares that it does not give any warranty, whether expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, correctness, relevance, suitabliity or reliability of any information contained in this web-site.
Here is an actual real life example of what I am talking about.........
Red book listing;
2001 E2 Kawasaki ZX9R
Trade in price guide* $6,500 - $7,700
National average price - private sale* $9,000 - $10,600
Price when new (RRP) $17,290
Last night I went and had a look at another ZX9R for a friend. It was an 01 with 27K and a full service history. After negotiating with the seller, he paid, $7000 for it, with 6 mnths rego, brand new tyres, and a RWC supplied! Somehow, I think the Red book/Glass Guide etc are way off the money. And if you read the disclaimers, they even make you aware of it!!!!!!