[UPDATED] Apparently my bike is/isn't/is/isn't a write off
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:24 am
Edited to update:
3/9/09: Told that my bike is to be written off
4/9/09: Sorted it out with the repairer and the assessor - now it's going to be repaired
7/9/09: Insurer again telling me my bike is written off and they need some documentation
8/9/09: Spoke with insurer for half an hour. They swear the bike is a write-off. The assessor swears it isn't. I swear that I just don't care either way anymore and just want to get to the bottom of it and have a final answer. More back and forth. Finally - someone notices there are two assessments attached to my file. One is for a written off Honda. They remove that from my file. Then they tell me that the other assessment still says my bike is a write off. I push further. They protest that the assessment is for my Kawasaki and that the Honda error is fixed - my bike is a write-off. Nope, not happy. I keep pushing. Finally - someone decides to look at the actual assessment. It's for a 1400. At a different repairer. With a different rego. They remove this assessment from my file too. Now they need to find the actual assessment. I call the assessor (again - he's so sick of hearing from me). He says he will resend it, then call them and confirm they have it and it is against my file. I'm not holding my breath, but at least (for now) it's NOT written-off again.
And I'd just started getting used to the idea of getting a new bike!
*********************************
OK, I got a message last night that my bike has been written off. I seriously am flabbergasted, as there was bugger all damage, but what can you do - they can pay me out and sell it damaged for a lot less cost than fixing it.
So, I figure I have the following options:
1) Ask for a cash settlement and fix it myself
Since they've decided to write it off, they won't give me the full amount of the repair quote, obviously, but I reckon I will get enough to fix it to my satisfaction, as I will be able to take the time to source cheaper parts and make my own calls on how it's fixed.
2) Take the insurance payout and get a new bike
It's insured for a reasonably high agreed value, so I won't do badly out of this option
Back of the envelope calculations lead us to believe that either option will be within an amount of money that isn't enough to sway the decision, so consider the financial side of things a wash.
So I'm left to decide whether I want to keep my bike or get a new one. So I'm having a major dilemma. And I would be happy to have opinions, especially from people who know my riding style, or who have ridden modern ZX6's and ZX10's and can compare them. Or if you can think of factors I haven't mentioned that may make a difference.
Keeping my bike
Pros:
I love my bike.
It's the best bike I've ever ridden, it makes me smile every time I see it, and I love riding it.
I've got it set up exactly how I want it.
I love the exhaust so much.
I'll get my baby back, practically as if nothing ever happened
Did I mention I'm in love with my bike - it's seriously an awesome bike.
Cons:
It's over 45 000 kms old and this will be the most cash I'll ever get for it.
Upgrading in a year or two isn't really on the cards due to other plans, so it is a chance to upgrade now with the least amount of outlay, or I'll be keeping it for a number of years, until she's pretty old.
It seems like the sensible thing to do is not keep my bike
Getting a new bike
Pros:
Who doesn't like a new bike?
I'm sure I'll love the next bike
I've wanted to own a ZX10 for a while. This will give me the chance to get an '04-'05 or an '06-'07 ZX10 without really affecting the budget - how often does that sort of chance come along?
I could either get a new ZX6 (probably an '08) - so upgrade my bike to the newer, lower km version or I can get a mid-km ZX10. I'm not sure which way I'd jump on this one - probably the older ZX10 over the newer ZX6.
Cons:
I've ridden Wattie's old '04-'05 ZX10. It felt almost exactly like my '06 ZX6, but with much more power. I'm not sure I need or will really use that extra power on the road, to be honest, even though I'm sure it's nice to have. And I like my licence.
I have an '08 ZX6 as a tracky, and the difference between it and my '06 ZX6 isn't huge enough that I'd upgrade without having a scenario like this. In my mind, I'd just be trading for a newer, lower km version of the bike I have.
So, keep and fix my baby. Get a nice '08 ZX6. Get an '04 - '07 ZX10. Anyone got an opinion?
I need Aunty Cath's advice line, but I hear she's currently in rehab...
3/9/09: Told that my bike is to be written off
4/9/09: Sorted it out with the repairer and the assessor - now it's going to be repaired
7/9/09: Insurer again telling me my bike is written off and they need some documentation
8/9/09: Spoke with insurer for half an hour. They swear the bike is a write-off. The assessor swears it isn't. I swear that I just don't care either way anymore and just want to get to the bottom of it and have a final answer. More back and forth. Finally - someone notices there are two assessments attached to my file. One is for a written off Honda. They remove that from my file. Then they tell me that the other assessment still says my bike is a write off. I push further. They protest that the assessment is for my Kawasaki and that the Honda error is fixed - my bike is a write-off. Nope, not happy. I keep pushing. Finally - someone decides to look at the actual assessment. It's for a 1400. At a different repairer. With a different rego. They remove this assessment from my file too. Now they need to find the actual assessment. I call the assessor (again - he's so sick of hearing from me). He says he will resend it, then call them and confirm they have it and it is against my file. I'm not holding my breath, but at least (for now) it's NOT written-off again.

*********************************
OK, I got a message last night that my bike has been written off. I seriously am flabbergasted, as there was bugger all damage, but what can you do - they can pay me out and sell it damaged for a lot less cost than fixing it.
So, I figure I have the following options:
1) Ask for a cash settlement and fix it myself
Since they've decided to write it off, they won't give me the full amount of the repair quote, obviously, but I reckon I will get enough to fix it to my satisfaction, as I will be able to take the time to source cheaper parts and make my own calls on how it's fixed.
2) Take the insurance payout and get a new bike
It's insured for a reasonably high agreed value, so I won't do badly out of this option
Back of the envelope calculations lead us to believe that either option will be within an amount of money that isn't enough to sway the decision, so consider the financial side of things a wash.
So I'm left to decide whether I want to keep my bike or get a new one. So I'm having a major dilemma. And I would be happy to have opinions, especially from people who know my riding style, or who have ridden modern ZX6's and ZX10's and can compare them. Or if you can think of factors I haven't mentioned that may make a difference.
Keeping my bike
Pros:
I love my bike.
It's the best bike I've ever ridden, it makes me smile every time I see it, and I love riding it.
I've got it set up exactly how I want it.
I love the exhaust so much.
I'll get my baby back, practically as if nothing ever happened
Did I mention I'm in love with my bike - it's seriously an awesome bike.
Cons:
It's over 45 000 kms old and this will be the most cash I'll ever get for it.
Upgrading in a year or two isn't really on the cards due to other plans, so it is a chance to upgrade now with the least amount of outlay, or I'll be keeping it for a number of years, until she's pretty old.
It seems like the sensible thing to do is not keep my bike
Getting a new bike
Pros:
Who doesn't like a new bike?
I'm sure I'll love the next bike
I've wanted to own a ZX10 for a while. This will give me the chance to get an '04-'05 or an '06-'07 ZX10 without really affecting the budget - how often does that sort of chance come along?
I could either get a new ZX6 (probably an '08) - so upgrade my bike to the newer, lower km version or I can get a mid-km ZX10. I'm not sure which way I'd jump on this one - probably the older ZX10 over the newer ZX6.
Cons:
I've ridden Wattie's old '04-'05 ZX10. It felt almost exactly like my '06 ZX6, but with much more power. I'm not sure I need or will really use that extra power on the road, to be honest, even though I'm sure it's nice to have. And I like my licence.
I have an '08 ZX6 as a tracky, and the difference between it and my '06 ZX6 isn't huge enough that I'd upgrade without having a scenario like this. In my mind, I'd just be trading for a newer, lower km version of the bike I have.
So, keep and fix my baby. Get a nice '08 ZX6. Get an '04 - '07 ZX10. Anyone got an opinion?
I need Aunty Cath's advice line, but I hear she's currently in rehab...