69 Hail Mary' for you my sonGosling1 wrote:![]()
do we ever
its drier than a nun's nasty down here
![]()

maybe a special one for smitty that only has 20bhp.I-K wrote:5. An updated ZX12R, 5kg lighter, slightly smaller in all directions.
First off its a KLX450R .. the KX IS the pure motocross machine.Going off the Kwaka USA information, the KX450R is clearly in the mould of the latter; no indicators, no rego plate holder, no tail light; in a way, it's understandable, because making it road-registrable would mean taking a mx engine designed to breathe through an open pipe and getting it through the emissions standards. If they're not bothering to do it in a market as huge as the US, they're not going to bother to do it for the few hundred bikes they can hope to sell per year in Australia.
mwahahahahahaI-K wrote:Honda had twin headlights on the CBX750 in 1984. That's 10 years before the 916 came out.Stereo wrote:You mean the twin headlights? Oh thats right.... Ducati did that first...BladeBoy wrote:It's a Honda knock off..
Even if you discount two-strokes like the reverse-cylinder Yamaha TZR250 (1990), Yamaha RZ500, Suzuki RG500 and Honda NS400R (all 1985), the Honda NR750 had an underseat exhaust in 1991, three years before the 916.Oh, you must mean the under-seat exhaust..... Oh! forgot... Ducati did that first too....
Honda RC30 had a single-sided swingarm in 1988, six years before the 916.Must mean the swingarm..... Oh darn...... ducati again.....
Massimo Tamburini is on the record as having used the Honda NR750 as the starting point when designing the 916.Honda does not Instigate, it emulates.....
awww carn Gos...tone it down a smidge mate...hit a raw nerve did he??Gosling1 wrote:The Munch is still a motorcycle with twin headlights FFS !!! the fact that it doesn't sell 20 billion per year is TOTALLY FUCKING IRRELAVENT !!! The endurance racer spawned an aftermarket industry of full-fairings with twin-headlights that were fitted to motorcycles all over the world. La Parisienne, Rickman, Harris - they all had twin-headlight aftermarket fairings....I-K wrote:Mhm, but the endurance racer was a one-off and the Munch was a fringe model from a fringe manufacturer.I guess all these twin-headlight bikes don't count either because they weren't mass-produced
![]()
*the conventional sense*......*the plug'n'play sense*.....I-K wrote:It's not a sportsbike in the conventional sense because you can't race it in the plug-and-play sense of slipping raceglass onto it and taking it to a race meeting.
Get a grip mate, your personal definitions of what constitutes a sports-bike are way off the mark. Are you telling all the ZX900 owners out there that they don't own a sports-bike because they can't enter it in a race meeting ?? What a load of frogshit![]()
What about the owner of an 1996 FZR1000 ??? Can't enter THAT in any race meetings, try telling the owner its a sports-tourer
![]()
![]()
Perhaps a better definition of a sports-bike is one that can lap Eastern Creek in under 1'50" ???? If so, my 26 yo Z1000 is *most definitely* a sportsbike !!!It leaves my ZX12 for dead
![]()
C,mon gos you know Nath is late Cause poor little Chloe has to piggy back his ar$e everywhereGosling1 wrote:aah, that shit was last week mate, we have already moved on .....
Well, no, they don't, really, because they featured an idea which the manufacturers hadn't yet gotten off their arses and started incorporating into their production models.Gosling1 wrote:The Munch is still a motorcycle with twin headlights FFS !!! the fact that it doesn't sell 20 billion per year is TOTALLY FUCKING IRRELAVENT !!! The endurance racer spawned an aftermarket industry of full-fairings with twin-headlights that were fitted to motorcycles all over the world. La Parisienne, Rickman, Harris - they all had twin-headlight aftermarket fairings....I guess all these twin-headlight bikes don't count either because they weren't mass-produced
Well, the ZX9 was a fairly common choice for a racebike in its day, and it acquitted itself ok...Are you telling all the ZX900 owners out there that they don't own a sports-bike because they can't enter it in a race meeting??
can't argue with that, it is a good description of both bikes.I-K wrote:...Bottom line, it's hard to argue that the ZX10 has taken over from the ZX12 because the two have been designed with different priorities. The ZX12 is a big, comfortable bike for the street which doesn't compromise on the suspension and motor. The ZX10 was built to lap a racetrack fast.
It is strange that the 12 will be discontinued in the US and Oz markets, but will continue to be produced for the European market ( at least according to some observers in the bike industry) - I think the 12 and the 14 could continue to be sold alongside each other, Oz is just too small a market to support both models at the same time I guess........This is why the 12 is so important, and that's why it needs to continue. The 14, with its low pegs, lack of a rear ride-height adjuster and long wheelbase goes too far in the direction of the Blackbird, while the 12 carries on in the vein of bikes like the GSX-R1100 and FZR1000, big bikes which handle.