goose of the week

Non Bike related Discussion - no politics or religion pls.
Post Reply
User avatar
dilligaf
KSRC Contributor
KSRC Contributor
Posts: 1675
Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 8:24 am
Bike: Z900
State: Victoria
Location: Melbourne

goose of the week

Post by dilligaf »

Speeding biker caught by video

A MOTORCYCLIST who filmed himself speeding through the Midi-Pyrénées at up to 175kph has been caught by police – after he accidentally dropped the camera on the roadside by a police station.
Officers found the abandoned camera a few hundred metres from their base in Lauzerte in the Tarn-et-Garonne and watched the 25-year-old biker clock up 65 breaches of the highway code in just 38km.
He had set off from Montauban with the camera mounted on the bike and during his route to Lauzerte broke the speed limit 23 times - reaching a peak speed at one point of 177kph.
On his way back home, the camera fell off without the driver noticing. He retraced his route the following morning and police recognised him and arrested him.
According to La Dépêche, the bike has been confiscated and the biker is due to appear in court next month.


http://www.connexionfrance.com/motorcyc ... ticle.html
That is why God made fast motorcycles, Bubba.... Hunter S. Thompson.
User avatar
triway
KSRC Member
KSRC Member
Posts: 341
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 8:17 pm
Bike: Other Kawi
State: Victoria
Contact:

Re: goose of the week

Post by triway »

In Australia, the police would have been investigated by IA for posession of the camera and the tape would have been inadmissable because they didn't have a warrant to view the recording..... :lol:
www.techspec-aus.com.au
www.trackdaypro.com.au
User avatar
ducati_paul
KSRC Contributor
KSRC Contributor
Posts: 1713
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 8:58 pm
Bike: ZX10R
State: New South Wales
Location: Sydney

Re: goose of the week

Post by ducati_paul »

triway wrote:In Australia, the police would have been investigated by IA for posession of the camera and the tape would have been inadmissable because they didn't have a warrant to view the recording..... :lol:
Really? :shock: even if they were viewing it to try to establish who owned the lost property?
2012 Royal Enfield Military for the Road
User avatar
aardvark
Apprentice Post Whore :-)
Apprentice Post Whore :-)
Posts: 5766
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 6:45 pm
Bike: Yamaha
State: South Australia
Location: Adelaide, S.A.
Contact:

Re: goose of the week

Post by aardvark »

ducati_paul wrote:
triway wrote:In Australia, the police would have been investigated by IA for posession of the camera and the tape would have been inadmissable because they didn't have a warrant to view the recording..... :lol:
Really? :shock: even if they were viewing it to try to establish who owned the lost property?
No, not really. As far as I'm concerned, that would have all been completely legitimate. Fortuitous finding of evidence is not the same as searching for evidence without a warrant.
User avatar
photomike666
Apprentice Post Whore :-)
Apprentice Post Whore :-)
Posts: 5956
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 12:01 am
Bike: ZX10R
State: Victoria
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Re: goose of the week

Post by photomike666 »

Interesting to know how they knew who the rider was if the video showed speedo reedings. Unless he has filmed himself, the reg plate of the bike and then the ride, the ride alone would be circumstansial (sp). He may have filmed him self and his bike, then lost the camera. Someone else may have filmed the high speed stuff and dumped the camera. How can either be proved?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
07 ZX10R since new, tracky TBA, KX450F, 87 CR250 restoration, GT MTB - I've got serious thrill issues, dude
Naked Twin
KSRC Regular
KSRC Regular
Posts: 815
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 10:56 am
Bike: Suzuki
State: New South Wales
Location: Sydney

Re: goose of the week

Post by Naked Twin »

Without seeing the video one can only speculate about why this person was so stupid and how they were able to be caught.

Nick
Post Reply